๐Ÿšš no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.2/5 from 860+ reviews
Beautyโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Beekman 1802 lavender bundle

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.2 out of 5(860 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$23​
$38.33
Sale
โœ“ no-cost shipment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Brand new2 hand creams2 bars of soap

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
prompt Shipping
โ†ฉ๏ธ
hassle-at no charge Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Beekman 1802 lavender bundle

Brand newly-released
2 hand creams
2 bars of soap​

This product is remarkable for anyone looking for quality Beauty products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 1145500

Category: Beauty > Bath & Body > Sets

Original Price:$38.33 USD

Sale Price:$23 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

๐Ÿšš transport & Returns

โœ“ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.2
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 5476 reviews
NP
Nathan Phillips โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท Albuquerque, NM
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
So glad I bought this
After a few days, the Beekman 1802 lavender bundle works well enough which feels reasonable.
19 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago ยท Seattle, WA​
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
So glad I bought this
For the price, the Beekman 1802 lavender bundle is hassle-no-cost to use so no complaints.
29 people found this helpful
SA​
Samantha Adams โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Seattle, WA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
premium
Nice design and good usability Beekman 1802 lavender bundle.​
15 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago ยท Phoenix, AZ
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
fabulous find!
The Beekman 1802 lavender bundle feels normal, not low quality.
18 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green โœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago ยท San Jose, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Outstanding!
To be fair, the Beekman 1802 lavender bundle is uncomplicated to use which is good enough.
47 people found this helpful