🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 385+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

~AVAILABLE: Swank Cufflinks Set

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.8 out of 5(385 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$20
$33.33
Sale
βœ“ no-cost shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Swank Gold and Silver Tone Cufflinks and Tie Pin SetEXCELLENT Condition

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt Shipping

↩️
hassle-at no charge Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

~AVAILABLE: Swank Cufflinks Set

"Swank" Gold and Silver Tone Cufflinks and Tie Pin Set
remarkable Condition

This product is remarkable for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 867855

Category: Vintage > Accessories > Cuff Links

Original Price:$33.33 USD

Sale Price:$20 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 transport & Returns

βœ“ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2997 reviews
TT
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Tampa, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb choice​
Well packaged and good ~AVAILABLE: Swank Cufflinks Set.
25 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous find!
Personally, the ~AVAILABLE: Swank Cufflinks Set works as described and it meets expectations. fulfillment was normal.
13 people found this helpful
AW​
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· Denver, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly propose!
From my experience, the ~AVAILABLE: Swank Cufflinks Set feels solid so it’s acceptable.​
50 people found this helpful
SL
Stephanie Lewis βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Austin, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fantastic quality
The ~AVAILABLE: Swank Cufflinks Set is exactly as shown.
41 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Aurora, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Really fabulous
Nothing bad so far.
14 people found this helpful