🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.4/5 from 920+ reviews
Men✓ In Stock🔥 Bestseller

NWT Chubbies Rigid Jorts

★★★★★4.4 out of 5(920 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$38
$63.33
Sale
✓ no-cost shipment on this item • Limited time offer

• newly-released with tags• Black• Button and zipper closure • Stretchy • Two front and two back pockets • 100% cotton• 5.5 inseam• Size 33

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt Shipping
↩️
hassle-at no charge Returns

📋 Product Description

NWT Chubbies Rigid Jorts

• newly-released with tags
• Black
• Button and zipper closure
• Stretchy
• Two front and two back pockets
• 100% cotton
• 5.5" inseam
• Size 33

This product is remarkable for anyone looking for quality Men products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 662517

Category: Men > Shorts > Denim

Original Price:$63.33 USD

Sale Price:$38 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 transport & Returns

✓ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days​

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.4
★★★★★
Based on 7534 reviews
EY
Elizabeth Young ✓ Verified Purchase
4 months ago · Charlotte, NC
★★★★★
Absolutely appreciate it
In daily use, it works as described and it’s fine overall. Nothing fancy.
44 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen ✓ Verified Purchase
2 months ago · Memphis, TN
★★★★★
magnificent find!
Feels sturdy enough. The NWT Chubbies Rigid Jorts doesn’t feel inexpensive.
49 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson
4 months ago · Philadelphia, PA
★★★★★
treasure it!
From my experience, the NWT Chubbies Rigid Jorts does its job which is good enough.
25 people found this helpful​
AP
Adam Parker ✓ Verified Purchase
2 months ago · San Antonio, TX
★★★★★​
A+ quality
In daily use, the NWT Chubbies Rigid Jorts is easy-to-use to use which feels reasonable.
23 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen
9 months ago · Denver, CO
★★★★★
Simply incredible
Honestly, the NWT Chubbies Rigid Jorts works fine so it’s acceptable.
23 people found this helpful