๐Ÿšš no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.8/5 from 732+ reviews
Menโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

B202 sterling silver 925 earrings

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.8 out of 5(732 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$28​
$46.67
Sale
โœ“ no-cost shipment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

As shown on photo cute

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
prompt Shipping
โ†ฉ๏ธ
hassle-at no charge Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

B202 sterling silver 925 earrings

As shown on photo cute

This product is remarkable for anyone looking for quality Men products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 538356

Category: Men > Jewelry > Earrings

Original Price:$46.67 USD

Sale Price:$28 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

๐Ÿšš transport & Returns

โœ“ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.8
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 6999 reviews
AR
Aaron Roberts โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Cleveland, OH
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
supreme purchase ever
To be fair, the B202 sterling silver 925 earrings works well enough and Iโ€™m satisfied. No setup issues.
7 people found this helpful
JD
John Davidson โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท Louisville, KY
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
actually impressed
The B202 sterling silver 925 earrings looks nice in use.
41 people found this helpful
CL
Christopher Lee โœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago ยท Tulsa, OK
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
extraordinary B202 sterling silver 925 earrings
Happy customer. Nice B202 sterling silver 925 earrings.​
22 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson โœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago ยท Philadelphia, PA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
exceptional choice
From my experience, it is plain to use and it works for me.
42 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท Austin, TX
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
extraordinary quality
In daily use, the B202 sterling silver 925 earrings fits my needs which feels reasonable.
46 people found this helpful