🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 660+ reviews
Womenβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

OLIVIA PREMIUM TIGHTS - Tights - ivory

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.8 out of 5(660 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$29.99
$49.98
Sale
βœ“ no-cost shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Rise : HighPattern : PlainArticle number : SWD81F000-A11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy shipment

↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

OLIVIA PREMIUM TIGHTS - Tights - ivory

Rise : High
Pattern : Plain
Article number : SWD81F000-A11

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 5955

Category: Women > Clothing > Socks & Tights

Original Price:$49.98 USD

Sale Price:$29.99 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ on the house distribution on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5107 reviews
WG
William Garcia βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 weeks ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality​
The OLIVIA PREMIUM TIGHTS - Tights - ivory meets expectations well.
30 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Fresno, CA

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
magnificent price and quality OLIVIA PREMIUM TIGHTS - Tights - ivory.
36 people found this helpful
DC​
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
truly impressed
I like how straightforward the OLIVIA PREMIUM TIGHTS - Tights - ivory is. hassle-free to use.​
2 people found this helpful
AC
Amber Carter βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Kansas City, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb choice
The OLIVIA PREMIUM TIGHTS - Tights - ivory is practical.
22 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Sacramento, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Absolutely outstanding
After a few days, it feels solid enough so it’s acceptable.
21 people found this helpful