🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 462+ reviews
Womenβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

MALVA LADDER RESISTANT TIGHTS - Tights

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.2 out of 5(462 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$27.99
$46.65
Sale
βœ“ no-cost shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Rise : HighPattern : PlainArticle number : SWD81F01D-Q11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy shipment
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

MALVA LADDER RESISTANT TIGHTS - Tights

Rise : High
Pattern : Plain
Article number : SWD81F01D-Q11

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 5704

Category: Women > Clothing > Socks & Tights

Original Price:$46.65 USD

Sale Price:$27.99 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ on the house distribution on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3764 reviews
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Orlando, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
extraordinary quality​
Personally, the MALVA LADDER RESISTANT TIGHTS - Tights is basic to use and I’m satisfied. Arrived on time.
31 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Fresno, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
adore it!
the MALVA LADDER RESISTANT TIGHTS - Tights works well enough and it’s fine overall.
15 people found this helpful
AC
Amber Carter
2 months ago Β· Cleveland, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid MALVA LADDER RESISTANT TIGHTS - Tights!
For the price, the MALVA LADDER RESISTANT TIGHTS - Tights works well enough so it’s acceptable.
15 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Cincinnati, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
cherish it!
Quality feels fine for the price.
47 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
extremely pleased
After a few use, it feels okay so it’s acceptable.
29 people found this helpful